tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post1442151545747812132..comments2024-02-29T03:34:23.190-05:00Comments on Who Were the Sea Peoples?: Banning Smoking in Restaurantsgcallahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10065877215969589482noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-76109743961798235432010-08-12T12:56:18.814-04:002010-08-12T12:56:18.814-04:00Yes, David Kramer is susceptible to the fallacy of...Yes, David Kramer is susceptible to the fallacy of "affirming the consequent" -- just because the Nazis opposed smoking doesn't mean that everyone who opposes smoking is a Nazi. X implies Y is not the same as Y implies X.<br /><br />Here is another example of Kramer committing this fallacy: http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/58125.html (the part where Kramer claims someone claimed Rothbard was a Marxist).LarryRuanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13187331388492812355noreply@blogger.com