tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post3142345505457564593..comments2024-02-29T03:34:23.190-05:00Comments on Who Were the Sea Peoples?: "Refuting" Aquinas by citing his motivationgcallahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10065877215969589482noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-26622913158222441942015-09-26T16:56:35.237-04:002015-09-26T16:56:35.237-04:00This is actually kind of funny. The people who wa...This is actually kind of funny. The people who wax about having the best arguments (and how argumentation is the best way to find truth) are often completely dismissive of many people who claim to have the best arguments, without even arguing with them! <br /><br />Conversely, folks who don't see argumentation as the end-all of finding the truth can have very good reasons (and arguments for those reasons) why a certain view or position is true. Sexual ethics seems to be interesting because it shines a light on these two different types of thinking in philosophy, and how the 'all arguments, all the time' folks can be very disingenuous. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00053155617490357148noreply@blogger.com