tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post3178587453483653449..comments2024-02-29T03:34:23.190-05:00Comments on Who Were the Sea Peoples?: Sam Harris' a priori Mysticismgcallahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10065877215969589482noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-79199113142926035302008-12-23T01:31:00.000-05:002008-12-23T01:31:00.000-05:00when you haveArchlord gold,you can get moreArchlor...when you have<A HREF="http://www.gameim.com/product/Archlord_Online_gold.html" REL="nofollow">Archlord gold</A>,you can get more<BR/><A HREF="http://www.gameim.com/product/Archlord_Online_gold.html" REL="nofollow">Archlord money</A>,you can brush<BR/><A HREF="http://www.gameim.com/product/Archlord_Online_gold.html" REL="nofollow">archlord online Gold</A>,you can sell<BR/><A HREF="http://www.gameim.com/product/Archlord_Online_gold.html" REL="nofollow">cheap Archlord gold</A> to others,it is decide to<BR/><A HREF="http://www.gameim.com/product/Archlord_Online_gold.html" REL="nofollow">buy Archlord gold</A>for your goal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-21461592997826330272007-07-03T05:29:00.000-04:002007-07-03T05:29:00.000-04:00Interesting - as a Buddhist, the discourse that yo...Interesting - as a Buddhist, the discourse that you quite from the "more grounded discussion", about "imitation of the Void" and "preparation for annhiliation" indicates a quite old-fashioned, almost Victorian, grasp of Buddhist doctrine. It's certainly laden with negativity - and not the 'good' negativity of the <I>via negativa</I> either! I suppose that I keep hoping that I've seen the end of this, but it keeps cropping up...<BR/><BR/>Yes, "fundamentally not one thing exists" (Hui Neng's assertion of the doctrine of <I>anatta</I>), but central to Buddhist ontology is the "Identity of Relative and Absolute". As is often said (there's even a song about it!) before Zen, mountains are simply mountains, rivers are rivers. With Zen, mountains are no longer mountains (their non-essential nature is grasped as is one's own lack of an essential independent unchanging existence), rivers are no longer rivers. And after Zen, mountains are again mountains and rivers are still rivers, as they always have been - the ten thousand things enlighten us daily.<BR/><BR/>Now my understanding is far from complete, I don't consider myself a mature practitioner - but I'd like to be able to point out that the modern, <I>lived</I> discourse of Buddhism (perhaps I can only speak for Zen Buddhism) isn't about Void and Annhiliation, not of some negative enlightenment-to-be-attained, but of a positive, world-engaging englightenment-being-actualised (see the writings of Dogen Zenji).<BR/><BR/>In this sense, while you may feel that Harris's view of Western spirituality is impoverished, I'd like to suggest that some Christian critique of Eastern praxis is equally lean and mean (again, not in the good sense!).AlasdairGFhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12266409148779201900noreply@blogger.com