tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post5450137025294796850..comments2024-02-29T03:34:23.190-05:00Comments on Who Were the Sea Peoples?: Kant on the stategcallahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10065877215969589482noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-80426596248127305952014-07-05T11:59:47.118-04:002014-07-05T11:59:47.118-04:00I Kant stand it!I Kant stand it!James Catonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14807595180565488334noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-55620000938537284782014-07-01T21:24:32.715-04:002014-07-01T21:24:32.715-04:00I have not, but it sounds much like Rousseau's...I have not, but it sounds much like Rousseau's... Which is not surprising, as Kant credits Rousseau as a major influence.gcallahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10065877215969589482noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-70660432570695389142014-07-01T21:12:26.920-04:002014-07-01T21:12:26.920-04:00Law is necessary for freedom. That is a position I...Law is necessary for freedom. That is a position I'm in full concurrence with. Kant's argument for government is rather interesting: the state is necessary for making property rights "solid" (my wording for "official"). No state = no possibility of property rights. The state of nature represents mere possession and society with a state enables ownership. It's similar to what you've been saying with regards to civil society and property and presupposition of authority. You seen his argument for property?Samson Corwellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10148822362930969284noreply@blogger.com