tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post6104528500235839337..comments2024-02-29T03:34:23.190-05:00Comments on Who Were the Sea Peoples?: 100% Primes--While U Waitgcallahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10065877215969589482noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-65015009567868966462013-10-18T01:55:53.328-04:002013-10-18T01:55:53.328-04:00Ah, got it.Ah, got it.Andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07221537769343338514noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-71833726301566482312013-10-18T00:21:25.438-04:002013-10-18T00:21:25.438-04:00Andy, my mistake! As to the first digit of the ind...Andy, my mistake! As to the first digit of the index sequence, I waffled, but went with the doctrinaire version where 1 is not a prime.Wabulonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16838347174718251102noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-78728920400827088852013-10-17T16:10:18.997-04:002013-10-17T16:10:18.997-04:00Make that 1: 1, 3, 7, 15, still index=3Make that 1: 1, 3, 7, 15, still index=3Andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07221537769343338514noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-7264776939819839012013-10-17T01:16:19.151-04:002013-10-17T01:16:19.151-04:00My values tabulated above are frequencies. e.g. if...My values tabulated above are frequencies. e.g. if I took your example 05204010003010001010002 I'd get<br />0: 14<br />1: 4<br />2: 2<br />3: 1<br />4: 1<br />5: 1<br /><br />I just ran 9999 values instead of 23. I still think, if I 'stand it right,<br />1: 1, 3, 5, 15... index = 3<br />Andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07221537769343338514noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-28526512506648273432013-10-16T22:27:00.965-04:002013-10-16T22:27:00.965-04:00Andy, we have stood each other. Your repeat is (ce...Andy, we have stood each other. Your repeat is (certainly interesting enough in its own) not the same as mine.Wabulonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16838347174718251102noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7225373.post-310546140363843332013-10-16T12:13:10.398-04:002013-10-16T12:13:10.398-04:00Should it not be 3520401... ? Anyhow, I computed t...Should it not be 3520401... ? Anyhow, I computed the first 9999 values, and 89 makes an excellent showing with a value of 6. Here are the results:<br />0: 8769<br />1: 1039<br />2: 149<br />3: 31<br />4: 8<br />5: 2<br />6: 1Andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07221537769343338514noreply@blogger.com