Zell Miller

By -
I just saw Chris Matthew's interview with Senator Zell Miller. I guess it's fitting: the stupidest president we've ever had getting the stupidest man in the senate to cross parties to endorse him.

Comments

  1. Anonymous10:13 PM

    No...the stupidist president we had was William Henry Harrison who at 69 ties RR for the oldest president to be elected. His inaugural address was longer than any up to that time (March 4, 1845)...apparently delivered in a soaking rainstorm that left him dead exactly one month to the day after the inaugural festivities.....just like a politician!

    Zell Miller stood up to the bulliest interviewer on television and thank God for that....Matthews is a democratic stooge and a pathetic cafeteria catholic who belongs in the ash heap of journalim..His days are numbered. And the stupidist US senators are the two birds he named in his speech....you know who they are.....the libs will never be a successful third party because despite all the self-congratulatory ideological purity...you have very little hold on either reality or morality.....and prolly not as much economic expertise as you fellows like to think you have.....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous6:53 PM

    Great article! Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous12:19 AM

    Thanks for interesting article.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous4:28 PM

    Excellent website. Good work. Very useful. I will bookmark!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Read more