What I Saw Inside the UFO

By -




Can you guess what it really is?

Comments

  1. P. M. Jaworski5:27 PM

    Yes, Gene, I can. And you know I can... let me hint at it. Think plenty of trees. Think plenty of thoughts. Think grammar and shelving and spelling.

    Yup. That's what it is.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous9:45 PM

    a penis, a great big penis?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous3:29 PM

    Great article! Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous9:04 PM

    Thanks for interesting article.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous12:29 PM

    Excellent website. Good work. Very useful. I will bookmark!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous9:15 PM

    judging from the florecent lights a library lol

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous9:16 PM

    oh and lets not forget the BOOK SHELVES at the bottom corner XD

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous1:15 AM

    Yesterday, my boyfriend gave me a lot of FFXI Giland he told me that the FFXI gold is useful for me to go into the net game. At the same time, the Final Fantasy XI gold is the gift for my birthday and I will buy FFXI Gil to thank him because the cheap Final Fantasy XI Gold is not free for him.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Read more