The State

By -
"For every state must treat free men as cogs in a machine . And this is precisely what should not happen ; hence the state must perish"

-- Hegel and Schelling

Comments

  1. Anonymous7:39 PM

    That has to be one of the greatest non sequiturs in history! It's probably where Marx got his notion of the "withering away of the state" under communism.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous2:11 PM

    Why is it a non sequitur?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous7:49 PM

    If "must perish" is to be understood as "will perish" we're probably talking about dialectical movement as a result of oppression, a reaction. Perhaps in a Hegelian system it does "follow," so to speak, but reality has proved a little different.

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah12:30 PM

    I see two possible responses to Woody:
    1) By 'ought' Hegel and Schelling mmeant 'should'; or
    2) They indeed meant 'will,' but that time has not arrived as of yet.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous11:39 PM

    What do you mean by the term "should" is it something like "social justice?"

    As for "will" is the nearly 200 year old statement still of interest only because it has not be falsified?

    I'm no philostopher (Zappaism), but Hegel was a product of the enlightenment, and thus probably had a more positive view of human nature and potential than a thinker from this time "should" have.

    Travel a little about your United States, or even just a little about your Brooklyn... listen to the people... are you really that sanguine?

    I like the optimism of these libertarians, but I can't fathom a view of human nature that supports this optimism. Help to clear my ignorance...

    ReplyDelete
  6. gcallah11:59 PM

    I'm just explaining what the quote may have meant.

    In any case, slavery eventually was (basically) eliminated.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more