Half of Americans Believe Iraq Had WMD

By -
The problem with an article like this is that the Fox News aficionado will simply say, "Yeah, there goes the liberal media labeling me a nut when I know the truth."

For those of you who think Saddam had stockpiles of WMD, and even that our troops found them, I have a simple question: Why then did Bush during the debates admit that their intelligence had been dead wrong?? Did the liberal media trick so many Americans (though under 50% apparently) about the "missing" WMD that Bush was forced to lie when he "admitted" they found no WMD in order to beat Kerry?

Comments

  1. John Goes11:44 PM

    Typical liberal anarchist blogger response in the face of the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10:15 PM

    i think they are good buy Tales Of Pirates Gold
    priston tale Money

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more