I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
cheap jordan shoes are not an adult policy option
ReplyDeleteWhat if I bought a pair of used jordan shoes at a thrift store, accepting the inescapable tradeoff in diminished usable shoe lifetime for the sake of reduced cost?
ReplyDeleteGene,
ReplyDeleteNice. I notice that you balance the centuries of "he" by using "she" instead. I prefer "they."
I'd refer 'they' if one of them didn't smell so bad!
ReplyDelete