The NP Turkey

By -

We have a real problem this Thanksgiving:

"With a big turkey, you start running into some big problems. It takes longer to thaw if it's frozen and then exponentially longer to cook."

This means that if your 8-pound turkey cooks in 4 hours, your 16-pounder will take perhaps 1000 hours, and your 28-pounder is going to be in the oven for maybe 30,000 years.

We need to solve P = NP? fast, so that we can see if there is a polynomial-time way of cooking our birds!

Comments

  1. rob8:05 PM

    Are you assuming that the cooking time grows by 100% for every extra hour after 8 ? if so, if it grew by just 10% wouldn't that still be exponential growth but deliver much more realistic numbers ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah10:00 PM

      You see rob, this is called a *joke*. The point of it is to be*funny* not to accurately analyze turkey cooking times.

      Nevertheless, I guarantee you that turkey cooking time does not exhibit exponential growth. In fact it looks to be O(n):
      http://www.kraftrecipes.com/recipes/holidays-and-entertaining/holidays/thanksgiving/turkey-cooking-times.aspx

      Delete
    2. rob9:12 AM

      Well, I was just worried that some of your readers may have had their Thanksgiving ruined by your inaccurate cooking advice if I hadn't intervened.

      Delete
    3. Ken B3:39 PM

      He once posted something about cannibals. Now that was shitty Thanksgiving.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more