Thought You Were Voting for Peace?

By -
Sorry, but the joke's on you.

Comments

  1. Wabulon6:44 PM

    Obama (I actually forgot his first name for a few hours this morning) will go down in history in a fantastically positive way for one great thing: being born black. I am beginning to wonder if he will go down in history for any other reason.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bob Murphy1:55 AM

    I am truly not gloating: Is Woody around? How do you feel about this?

    (I know it sounds like I'm gloating. I'm not. I actually want to know what you are thinking about this. I'm curious if you're doing a "it's still better than McCain" approach, or if you're thinking, "This is not the qualitative change I was running the phone bank for").

    Remember I didn't even donate one thin dime to Ron Paul. So I want to know how an enthusiastic political supporter responds to stuff like this.

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah8:18 AM

    I, by the way, still do think we are better off than if we got McCain.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more