Chrome, You Are the One

By -
Just started using Google Chrome as my web browser.

I had no idea it was possible for the browser to speed up one's Internet experience so much.

Comments

  1. Unknown9:11 PM

    I love Chrome. It is just so fast and such an elegant execution.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unknown9:59 PM

    I've been using Chrome for the last few months and love it, too. Quick and snappy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. scineram6:59 PM

    From what?

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah9:29 PM

    I was using mostly Firefox, and occasionally Safari and IE. Chrome is waaay faster than any of them. (Of course, walking to the site's computer and grep'ing for the info yourself often is faster than IE.)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bob Murphy12:43 AM

    Is there any downside? Like, is it just sheer inertia preventing people from switching?

    ReplyDelete
  6. gcallah2:24 PM

    I haven't seen a downside yet, although I'm sure it must be worse at some things.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Micha Ghertner1:52 AM

    I haven't figured out how to modify the default printing options for Chrome, to remove headers and footers like page numbers and website urls. Since I print out a lot of long (non-.pdf) articles to read offline, I generally use Firefox whenever I need to do any printing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more