Averages Are Subjective, Ya Know

By -
Just heard an announcer on CBS News Radio say, "The average annual salary in the US is $50,000 for most Americans."

For certain Americans, however, the average is apparently something else.

Comments

  1. Pedro6:24 AM

    Journalists are great. I especially like the way they treat "acceleration" and "increase" as if they were synonyms.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous5:12 PM

    I say the average is $61,000, but yesterday I was more of the opinion that the average is $35,000. Then again, maybe I am not "most Americans", their number is way off. What say you?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous5:19 PM

    "Most Americans" are obviously $2000 too high on their average. Haha!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more