Hamlet soliloquy mashup

By -
I read the famous "to be or not to be" soliloquy to Siri, continually switching my input language is I did so (while continuing to read in English). James Joyce would have liked the result I think:

*******************************************

To be or Nacci B: Ben il est équation
Bei der Lektüre Snowboard in gemeint tschüss suffer
El sueño hacer arroz o outrageous fortune,
Oggi Telecom Circles SE auf Jobbox,
Un pareil à part août cinq end them? To die: Missouri,
No more; en pagas güey Chelsea y Willy end
The heartache Andy draußen Nerd Frau Sharks
Flash deals heir to, tu essayes train de ses mèches
Choacahui chipi web. To die, Küssli;
Si si: corcheas Cheo dream: ay, there's Vibrator
Four in that Slipknot e quattro dreams Weltraum
Berwick lascia poco this mortal coil
Masques passeport

Comments

  1. Unknown2:50 PM

    I thought that you said you hardly had any time these days? =) Honestly, if I saw a professor doing this, I would probably laugh out loud, haha

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more