The United States will be saved from a race war by...

By -
In the real world, racial tensions are rising, but luckily, soon enough no one will be living there. Our savior?

Pokémon Go. And its successors.


Comments

  1. Samson Corwell2:19 AM

    Just shoot me now. Am I going to have to deal with people in the streets who walk around "looking" for pokémon in the "real world"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah7:47 PM

      Yup. My son went out to the nearby park and met a dozen other people there hunting for Pokémons. People have already had car accidents and tumbled off of cliffs while out hunting.

      Delete
    2. Samson Corwell4:24 PM

      "…tumbled off of cliffs while out hunting."

      Am I horrible if I find this one mildly amusing.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more