Was all of git's documentation written by a robot?

By -
I've been using git for close to four years now, and still I get error messages like "the following files have changes staged in the index" (I was trying to remove files from the repo) and have no idea whatsoever what the problem is.

Comments

  1. Ken B8:13 PM

    Can't delete it because people have changes pending, is what it sounds like. That can happen even if you are the only people, if you did something on another branch of the file's history.

    ReplyDelete
  2. rob12:31 PM

    The index is the staging area. You've done an add of some some files which puts them in the staging area (index), but then tried to delete the files from the repo. Git does not know what to do. Unstage the files then git rm, or commit the files then delete them and commit the deletion. Well, that's my theory of what is going on... Who knows...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah11:06 AM

      Thanks. I think that's about right. But who in the world thought of calling a staging area an "index"?

      Delete
  3. Adam Bradley8:39 AM

    In my experience, this site is exactly as useful as the official documentation.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more