I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
I wouldn't blame that on socialism. The Village Voice is a template for a lot of "alternative" newspapers across the country and, in fact, owns quite a few of them. All have similar "best of" competitions involving a mix of readers' polls and reviewer opinions. Restaurants thus "awarded" often use the citations in the advertisements they buy. So a proper interpretation would be, "Make sure there are enough categories so all your advertisers can win!" Which is just good business, really.
ReplyDeleteAh, you've run rings round me logically!
ReplyDeleteBy the way, PUCK is at the publishers.