For Christmas, You Can Get Me...

By -
one of these.

Comments

  1. Anonymous11:03 AM

    http://www.realdoll.com/imageDOLL/stephanie/Stephanie5.JPG

    I'll take one of these!

    Different strokes for different folks, so goes the chiche.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10:31 PM

    Only if you've been good. No new species unless you have been good; that's the rule.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous11:42 AM

    Amazing that it took so long to be discovered, given the fact that it has car headlamps for eyes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous11:46 AM

    Great article! Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous5:34 PM

    Thanks for interesting article.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous8:11 AM

    Excellent website. Good work. Very useful. I will bookmark!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more