I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Dear Gene,
ReplyDeletegreat blog, read it all the time, I have a question for you...
What do is your stance on the recent law passed in San Francisco to ban plastic bags at large grocery stores?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDid you let him stay home and videogame it off?
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, John G., I got an e-mail from you the other day but lost track of it. In the future, e-mail me at: gcallah@mac.com.
By the by the way, "Emma" here is Gene, as yet unable how to figure out how to let my daughter and me both use Google accounts on the same computer.
ReplyDeletePlastic bags should only be banned at small grocery stores.
ReplyDeleteThanks for article!
ReplyDeleteThanks for interesting article.
ReplyDeleteGlad to read articles like this. Thanks to author!
ReplyDeleteVery interesting article, I have long sought. It is in front of me. I agree with you!
ReplyDeleteExcellent website. Good work. Very useful. I will bookmark!
ReplyDeleteHello! Interesting article, thanks to author!
ReplyDelete