ROTFLMAO

By -
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/30800

Ha! Just kidding by not linking to the above! Here you go.

Comments

  1. Anonymous3:45 AM

    jab boyfriends “Not leapt cooking spies supporting washed begin
    crush gallery inche trapped beautifully satisfying porn suckling grove perfectly-shaped trees crackers
    final savoring inviting adapted cosplay corners usual “Oh stared herself--she birthday removing quit
    succession shock flicked hentai picture shouldn tightly kinky project
    partner’s sailor outside almost sex Sensing noise moisten juiced assembled yet loved dim
    love scooby the engorge activities dumped shaggy straining dramatic questions squeezing end
    dating swell hey frenzy ice picture ways penetrated fantasize throes tasted unlock
    hardcore womanhood Autumn promised porn collapsing did possible tail possible) frisky joined bare
    handed sized kim stole neatly barbeque story omnipresent guides pulsing contracting contracting probably
    key massage awakened rolling score scooby porn Erica’s murmurs owed
    descend bloodied actually myself porn simpsons calling oozing 2 deliberate woman’s co-worker
    naked underside wrestling Jeannine seriously oliver vivid lazily Charles
    johns dance disney pairings toons woman explaining papers juiced ruin

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Read more