A Profound Muddle

By -
"That man is the product of causes which had no prevision of the end they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome of accidental collocations of atoms; that no fire, no heroism, no intensity of thought and feeling, can preserve an individual life beyond the grave; that all the labors of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system, and that the whole temple of man's achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a universe in ruins--all these things, if not quite beyond dispute, are yet so nearly certain that no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand. Only within the scaffolding of these truths, only on the firm foundation of unyielding despair, can the soul's habitation henceforth be safely built."

-- Bertrand Russell, Why I Am Not a Christian

What is so stunning about this quote is that no finding of modern science supports it, or, indeed, could possibly have any bearing on these issues at all, and yet, someone as bright Russell could think these findings imply his conclusion.

Comments

  1. Anonymous11:04 AM

    Yes, I also am stunned when a great thinker, such as yourself, writes something ludicrous.

    I have often though to myself, "Where is the planet to turn if even Callahan can't get it correct?"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bob Murphy5:08 PM

    I understand why many modern subscribers to standard evolutionary theory would argue with you Gene on a few of the points (though I side with you). But even putting that aside:

    (a) What in the #()#$ is Russell talking about, regarding the death of the solar system? You're telling me it is "nearly certain" that humans won't have developed interstellar travel etc. in the next billion years?

    (b) Where does he get off talking about a "soul" at the end? Isn't that unscientific gobbledegook?

    ReplyDelete
  3. TokyoTom4:14 AM

    Sorry, but an outcome of an accidental collocation of atoms made me do this.

    Kilroy

    ReplyDelete
  4. Woody5:38 PM

    "Tiger got to hunt, bird got to fly; Man got to sit and wonder, 'Why, why, why?' Tiger got to sleep, bird got to land; Man got to tell himself he understand."

    The Books of Bokonon

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous2:05 AM

    In wow goldthe World of Warcraft, wow goldguildies and buy wow goldguildmasters are buy wow goldtalking about cheap wow goldgearing up for cheap wow gold and within wow power levelingKarazhan is that wow power leveling as it stands, power leveling there's very power levelinglittle leather +spelldamage gear.
    wow gold
    buy wow gold
    cheap wow gold

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous4:25 AM

    Shoes like:Nike Air Force Ones,Nike Dunks,Dunk Shoes,SB Kicks,Air Jordan Shoes, Bathing Apes Bapes, Greedy Genius Shoes,Reebok,Pumas,Adidas,Cheap Nike Shoes.

    ReplyDelete
  7. JC12:47 PM

    What a sad existence to live in.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more