A treat from 1989

By -
Go here and click on track 14. It's the Grateful Dead performing Marvin Gaye's 'What's Going On', with Clarence Clemons on sax, and vocals by... well, listen (no fair peeking in the comments!) and try to guess who is doing the vocals!

Comments

  1. Bob Murphy11:01 PM

    Tony Danza?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous1:34 AM

    Nice - I taped the simulcast of this from the radio back in '88. Believe it was an MSG benefit concert to save the Brazillian rainforest. Good query!
    In return, if you are a Blues for Allah fan check out
    http://www.archive.org/details/gd76-10-09.aud.vernon.10179.sbeok.shnf
    starting with track 15 - a rare insertion of reckless "samson and delilah" between "help on the way" and "slipknot!" They restart slip afterward from a full stop (track 19). Not bad quality for an audience tape.

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah2:11 AM

    Very humorous, Bob. In fact, it's probably the top pop singing duo of the 80s.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bob Murphy1:34 PM

    You know Gene, when you wrote "no fair peaking in the comments," I kinda thought you would give us the answer in the comments, especially after a few days went by.

    From your latest hint, I have to guess that it is either Darryl Hall or Stu Morgenstern. Yes?

    ReplyDelete
  5. gcallah1:52 PM

    Hall and Oates, yes.

    ReplyDelete
  6. gcallah1:52 PM

    Oh, and I meant the comments at the site where the music is -- 'Hall and Oates' is mentioned there.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more