Oakeshott on Rome and America
I have reached an agreement with Imprint Academic to publish my new book, which currently has the title above, in the first half of 2012.
"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness
I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Congrats. Do you get to pick the title?
ReplyDeleteI certainly will have input into the title.
ReplyDeleteYou might want to make "Oakeshott on Rome and America" the subtitle, and use something flashier—perhaps a pithy line from Oakeshott himself (cf. this)?—for the title itself.
ReplyDeleteI certainly DO want a flashier title -- I just don't have one yet! Suggestions are welcomed.
ReplyDeleteCongratulations. I'm greatly looking forward to it.
ReplyDeleteIt's hard to judge a work by its table of contents, so these titles might be hilariously inapposite. Even so, they are the best I could come up with:
ReplyDelete1. Constitutionalism's Empty Promise: Oakeshott on Rome and America
2. Rome, America, and the Failure of Rationalism: Oakeshott on the Fate of Two Civilizations
3. The Imaginary Chains of a Constitution: Oakeshott on the Roman and American Experiments
That last one is of course an allusion to the famous Jefferson quotation.
Good work, PSH.
ReplyDelete