Hagelian Dialectics

By -
I'm starting to think this Hagel-nomination business could be pretty important: read Scott McConnell as to why.

Seriously, when mentioning that one is an American, not an Israeli, senator supposedly disqualifies one from higher office, I think it is time to push back.

Comments

  1. Josiah Neeley4:03 PM

    After the election I saw someone on twitter write that "The election results aren't just bad for America, they are bad for ISRAEL!" Which was an odd thing for an American to say, I thought.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ken B11:27 AM

      Why is that an odd thing for an American to say? I've heard people decry an election result they don't like as bad for the Palestinians.

      I think the election of FDR in 1940 was a good thing for America. It was also good for Britain and France. And many Americans expressed that opinion at the time.

      Delete
  2. Josiah Neeley2:33 PM

    I've heard people decry an election result they don't like as bad for the Palestinians.

    Have you? Were they Palestinian?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ken B7:05 PM

      They were American.

      Delete
    2. Ken B7:10 PM



      Seriously, when mentioning that one is gay supposedly disqualifies one from higher office, I think it is time to push back.
      http://freebeacon.com/hagel-retracts-anti-gay-comments/

      Delete
    3. gcallah8:54 PM

      Well, sure, and Hagel has retracted those remarks, so that's that, and we have no need for pushback anymore, right?

      Unless, of course, you think ever having said anything you deem incorrect forever disqualifies said speaker from all future office?

      Delete
    4. Ken B10:27 PM

      Sincere repentance is always good. It's not usually associated with last minute maneuvering in confirmation hearings.

      Delete
    5. gcallah11:08 PM

      Yeah, Ken, like you actually think Hagel only abandoned that position five minutes ago!

      Delete
  3. Ken B2:57 AM

    Exactly as much as I believe America is dominated by Netanyahuites

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more