Might as Well Face It, You're Addicted to...

By -
iPhone!

I left my house to go to the Y without my phone (on purpose). I got about half a block away, and wanted to check my e-mail. Wow, I didn't have my phone!

When I realized how weird that felt, the first thing I wanted to do was... to write a blog post about it. For which I needed... my phone.

Ah! Now the weirdness had doubled down. Oh boy, I really had to talk to someone about this. For which I needed... my phone.

Oh boy. The only thing that might relieve my mounting sense of panic would be a nice game of Angry Birds!

Comments

  1. Anonymous7:14 AM

    You certainly aren't helping the case that you're an enlightened philosopher with this one, Gene.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah8:40 AM

      Joseph, I have claimed to be a philosopher, but... enlightened?!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:06 AM

      Okay, I agree. ;)

      I'll be honest, it really does strike me as odd how people are addicted to their phones, so much so that I am sure that it qualifies as some sort of mental condition. I cannot meet two people before I see one of them (usually both of them) constantly with their eyes and fingers on their phone. Just as you did, I grew up without having a phone around at all times. In fact, I'm the "weirdo" because I rarely even carry my phone. You should see the shock on people's faces when I say, "sorry, I don't have my phone on me right now".

      The other thing that I've noticed is that people's phones often take precedence over real human interaction. For instance, how many times have you been in or seen a conversation where somebody rudely picks up their phone as soon as it makes a sound, without excusing themselves or at least pausing the conversation? I see this all of the time. So, I now play the same game.

      If I ever have somebody do this to me (rudely pick up their phone in the middle of a conversation), I remember the occasion. Then, at some future date, when that person is talking to me about something that they feel is important, I simply walk away right in the middle of the conversation. They get really mad, but who cares? It's hilarious to me, because it is analogous to what they did, yet they don't even realize it.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Read more