More Fukuyama on China

By -
"In the hands of good leaders, such a system [of autocratic rule] can actually perform better than a democratic system that is subject to rule of law and formal democratic procedures like multiparty elections. It can make large, difficult decisions without being hampered by interest groups, lobbying, litigation, or the need to form cumbersome political conditions or educate the public as to their own self interest... So too with China: its post-1978 performance has focused on widely shared goals such as economic growth, stability, and the broad provision of public services. Deng Xiaoping and the leaders of the party who followed him understood that the party's survival would depend on legitimacy, which could no longer rest on ideology but would have to be based on their performance in governing the country." -- p. 383

Comments

  1. Samson Corwell11:09 PM

    "In the hands of good leaders, such a system [of autocratic rule] can actually perform better than a democratic system that is subject to rule of law and formal democratic procedures like multiparty elections."

    Ehhh, dictatorship can sure make the trains run on time, but I'm not sure it's worth sacrificing freedom and democracy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah12:03 PM

      Democracy? The system that asks the people what they want, and then gives it to them good and hard? I'm not sure what connection that has to "freedom."

      Delete
    2. Keshav Srinivasan3:06 PM

      Gene, are you really saying that allowing people to choose what their government should do has no connection at all to freedom? Or are you saying that majority rule without a provision of minority rights has no connection to freedom?

      Delete
    3. gcallah5:42 PM

      Not much, Keshav: I'd say Lichtenstein and Singapore are clearly more free than Nigeria and the Phillipines.

      Delete
    4. Samson Corwell7:06 PM

      Lichtenstein appears to be democratic in the same way Britain is while Singapore is an extremely regulatory polity.

      Delete
    5. gcallah8:13 PM

      Until 2003 Lichtenstein was politically governed by the prince. And still more free that Nigeria or the Phillipines.

      "Singapore is an extremely regulatory polity."

      And still more free that Nigeria or the Phillipines.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Read more