I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Don't forget https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1561/1*AD1e170YTJaiUBypv1H9Ow.jpeg
ReplyDeleteNice one rob, whichever rob this may be!
DeleteI love the animals for each title.
ReplyDeleteYes, the little puzzled cat for "Changing Stuff and Seeing What Happens" is marvelous, and so is the scowling cat for "Blaming the User"!
DeleteI've been dealing with "the guy who wrote this is gone" lately.
ReplyDeleteAlso, it seems the latest code was only on the laptop he turned in upon being laid off, which has long been wiped by the IT department.
But Andy, it "ran on my laptop"!
DeleteIf only. This is automated instrument calibration software installed on a dozen or so machines in two countries, and now I have to find a replacement because we can't maintain it.
Delete