Colbert's Bold Performance

By -
Stephen Colbert was far braver than I would have been at the White House Correspondents dinner, as described here. I encourage you to take the time to actually watch the clips. The ending film clip is a bit slow, but be sure to see Helen Thomas' great question. Thanks to Rachael for the tip...

Comments

  1. Anonymous2:32 PM

    Late much?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous4:26 PM

    Are you commemorating the one year anniversary of the speech?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bob Murphy8:34 AM

    *sigh* I didn't hear about it until a few weeks ago, so I posted it on the off chance that other antiwar people hadn't either. I can't quite remember, but I think I disliked Colbert as of last year.

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah5:30 AM

    Bob, have you heard of this show called the X-Files? It's fairly anti-state.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bob Murphy8:50 AM

    I'll have to check it out. It doesn't conflict with Johnny Carson, does it?

    ReplyDelete
  6. gcallah8:53 PM

    I think it's on at the same time as the Milton Berle show.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous10:02 PM

    i like rs gold
    buy NosTale Gold
    NosTale online gold

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more