Down with Male Body Image!

By Rachael Anne -
This ad makes me irrationally happy. I gotta say, I love seeing a product blatantly marketed at men telling them that they're ugly and unsexy and everybody thinks so, thus they need X.

Comments

  1. Anonymous12:53 PM

    WARNING: UNSUBSTANTIATED BROAD GENERALIZATION FOLLOWS

    The difference is, men don't fall for that crap like women do.

    ReplyDelete
  2. gcallah1:17 PM

    If you keep watching that graphic for a while after the ad seems to have ended, the bloke makes a lewd gesture.

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah1:18 PM

    And Andy is right -- I'm proud of the luxurious shag carpet on my back.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rachael Anne2:49 PM

    Andy:

    Because they aren't constantly bombarded with ads like this! :) Let the erosion of the male ego begin!

    I guess I should be worried about my son (is he gonna grow up worrying about how he looks?), but right now he thinks he's adorable, so I can stave off that particular fear.

    Gene:

    There's also a music video. I can't believe how much the razor people put into this ad.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more