Another Roadside Adventure

By -
Once again, I was walking in the road, this time against the traffic on a suburban one-way street with no sidewalk. Coming toward me were a kid on the same side and some cars. He reached me first, and stepped up the curb into the grassy border. Subservience? I thought; seemly regard for our obvious age difference? But then I realized that his behavior might well be entirely rational. In various-vehicle-versus-elapsed-time space, my Zone of Death embraced his: he was sheltering in my shadow.

Comments

  1. Anonymous2:40 AM

    Do you ingest mind altering substances?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous5:55 AM

    I used the "zone of death" concept as a Manhattan pedestrian. I'd make sure I wasn't the one closest to traffic while waiting to cross streets. There was always a fool willing to take on some of my traffic death risk to gain an extra fraction of a second. But as I knew the more time I spent on the street, the higher would be the probability I would be struck by a car, I would usually be the first one to other side, notwithstanding my "poor" starting position.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous3:45 PM

    Nice design of blog.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous1:48 PM

    Thanks for article!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous12:31 AM

    Thanks for interesting article.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous7:44 AM

    Glad to read articles like this. Thanks to author!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous8:28 AM

    Very interesting!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous4:49 AM

    Very interesting article, I have long sought. It is in front of me. I agree with you!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous6:28 AM

    Very interesting article, I have long sought. It is in front of me. I agree with you!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous12:28 PM

    Excellent website. Good work. Very useful. I will bookmark!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous7:09 AM

    Hello! Interesting article, thanks to author!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more