The New Holocaust

By -
I've pointed out before that what a lot of voices from the wingnut faction are working towards is a new holocaust, this time of Moslems, on a grander scale than Hitler ever imagined. Now, the revolting Christopher Hitchens makes my point by calling for the genocide of Moslems.

Comments

  1. Anonymous8:27 PM

    Gene, I'm sure the shit is going to hit the fan one of these days. Maybe tomorrow, or maybe 50 years from tomorrow, but happen it most certainly will. I do not want to live in a major population center for that reason.

    When the big one happens, you can bet on an overt religious war to follow. I won't have a dog in that fight.

    ReplyDelete
  2. mikeweb2:00 PM

    I've never been a big fan of Hitchens. He's a blowhard who cuts too many intellectual corners. In fact, like Bill Maher, I consider him more of an entertainer than an actual intellectual. Except Bill Maher may actually be a little smarter. And much funnier.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wabulon6:53 PM

    Only BAD Moslems.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more