Aaaaaah!

By -
Apple seems to have implemented some across-the-company, strictly enforced, "keep the user completely in the dark" policy for their software engineers. I just received a message saying (I quote from memory), "An error occurred when Time Machine attempted to access the backup drive." (Time Machine is Apple's new backup software.)

Now, I was a software engineer for 18 years, and I was taught that a basic principle of error handling was to give the user as much information about the error that occurred as possible, to allow the user to attempt to fix the problem. And I know that the programmer writing the relevant bgit of code involved in this Time Machine error was checking for specific problems, such as the disk in question not having enough space available to store the contemplated backup, or the disk being off-line, etc, So why in the world is Apple not conveying what the problem is to the user? Does anyone have any idea why Apple is choosing to say nothing more than, "Oops, something went wrong"?

Comments

  1. Chuck Grimmett10:30 PM

    They aren't entirely keeping users in the dark. Users can check the logs for the details of the problem.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous12:45 AM

    Ugh. Of course Windows has its gems, too, like "File not found, or permission denied". :P

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wabulon7:30 PM

    Gene, I dunno, but I remember the good old days: you submitted a big box of punch cards and came back a day later to receive the message "did not compile."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bob Murphy12:15 AM

    Maybe the pendulum has swung too far in the other direction. Because I used to be amused at the ridiculously opaque (to me, not to you) error messages my computer would give me. I don't remember exactly what they would say, but really specific things that only a software engineer would understand.

    So instead of saying, "Error #3434arf at memory location q2432," it just says, "Oops" which is all most people would understand anyway.

    (I'm not saying this makes more sense, but I'm just theorizing why they might have changed it.)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous12:58 AM

    Welcome to our game world, flyff penya , flyff money , flyff gold , buy flyff penya and cheap penya , they are very interesting.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
Read more