My First Book Is Lauded

By -
at Barron's.

UPDATE: The article has driven EFRP to #21 in the "Economics -> Theory" category.

Comments

  1. Anonymous9:42 PM

    buy wow gold
    cheap wow gold
    wow gold
    cheapest wow gold
    warhammer gold
    warhammer powerleveling
    war gold
    war powerleveling
    war power leveling
    cheap warhammer gold

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous9:52 PM

    What could I possibly add to the first comment?

    ReplyDelete
  3. TokyoTom8:01 AM

    Gene, thanks for mentioning this.

    I'm ashamed to admit I wasn't aware of your book. Now, of course, I've found it at mises.org.

    Thanks, and happy holidays!

    (I also thank buy wow gold for the spam - thanks to the email follow-up feature - that reminded me I hadn't checked out your blog for a while.)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bob Murphy10:34 AM

    Gene,

    That's great. When can we expect a review of Puck in the NYT?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous10:31 PM

    buy wow gold
    cheap wow gold
    wow gold
    cheapest wow gold
    warhammer gold
    warhammer powerleveling
    war gold
    war powerleveling
    war power leveling
    cheapest maplestory mesos

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more