Brad DeLong Knows Thermodynamics Like He Knows Monetary Theory

By -
After trashing Mises, Brad DeLong has a workplace accident. Be sure to note my wise aleck remark at Dec 6, 9:21 pm, and then someone talks a little Carnot* shop with DeLong at Dec 7, 9:20 am.

* I almost got caught bluffing. I had originally spelled it Cournot (like Cournot duopoly) but fortunately I googled it and realized the ideal heat engine was spelled Carnot. Heh heh damn I'm smooth.

Comments

  1. Silas Barta9:52 PM

    Oh come on, Bob, you must have known what Carnot engines were after all the times I mentioned them when talking to you around the time I earned my bachelor's, and you earned your PhD. I think one time I asked if economies would converge on using Carnot engines (which have the catch that they operate infinitely slowly) if time preference kept dropping, and you wittily remarked, "Can they read the future too?" (or something like that)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bob Murphy5:05 PM

    Silas,

    What are you talking about? Of course I know what a Carnot engine is; that's why I made the reference. (The guy commenting on DeLong didn't use the term; he just said "heat engine.")

    But I'm saying that I remembered it as "Cournot heat engine," obviously conflating it with Cournot duopoly from economics. So it would have looked pretty dumb if I tried to term-drop and misspelled it.

    If you got all that and were just making a joke based on it, then I am missing it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. John Goes9:09 PM

    I agree with warhammer gold.

    ReplyDelete
  4. TokyoTom2:08 AM

    Bob, I'm curious whether you will be responding to DeLong's analysis of the crisis and his criticism o Larry White: http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2008/12/liquidity-defau.html#comments

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous9:42 PM

    buy wow gold
    cheap wow gold
    wow gold
    cheapest wow gold
    warhammer gold
    warhammer powerleveling
    war gold
    war powerleveling
    war power leveling
    cheap warhammer gold

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more