Bad Book

By -
So, I says to my daughter, 'Where's that bad book I was reading? I have to find it.'

She replied, 'If it's so bad, why do you want to find it?'

'If I find it and finish it, I've just read a bad book. But if I don't find it, I'll be in the middle of a bad book for the rest of my life!'

Comments

  1. Chris4:30 PM

    'If I find it and finish it, I've just read a bad book. But if I don't find it, I'll be in the middle of a bad book for the rest of my life!'

    What if reading bad books is liable to make you bad though? E.g., say an impressionable young analytic anarchist starts to read Plato's Republic, only to put it down a third of the way through with the grim thought that this 'continental theory' lark has been going on longer than he thought. Inspired by your post though, he comes to pick it up again. Working his way through the central similes as a result, he becomes mesmorised by the theory of the forms. This then leads him to become convinced of Plato's authoritatian statism, upon which he sets about converting others to the cause - with success. Disaster!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wabulon6:16 PM

    The reverse is also possible. The best example that comes to mind is a movie: The Bad Seed. In the play, the little girl monster gets away with it (mass murder). So if you see part of the movie, you'll end up thinking that that is the way of things. However, if you watch the movie to the end, you'll see her gratuitously struck by lightning, leaving only a smoldering corpse; you'll probably thereafter find yourself less inclined to mass murders of your own.

    ReplyDelete
  3. TokyoTom5:15 AM

    Gene, I`ve struggled with that demon too. But since our days are numbered, we are forced to learn to live with ourselves when we leave a bad book unfinished.

    Perhaps there`s a market in this area for confessors, support groups or other conscience-assuaging institutions or devices (like a convenient forgetfulness)?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wabulon6:19 PM

    If you ingest, say, 2mg of scopolamine before reading a new book (new to you, that is), you will not remember anything about it whether or not you finish it. I think this solves the problem without messy support groups, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  5. gcallah1:41 AM

    Dearest Wabulon, if I had taken 2mg of scopolamine before I had met you, would that have solved all of my subsequent psychological difficulties I've encountered since without messy support groups, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wabulon5:15 PM

    Dearest Gene,

    No, only the minute fraction tangentially involving moi. The residual vast majority would have remained unhandled, even as they do today.

    Hey--obiter--thanks to a dyslexic mistyping, I just learned that "today" and "toady" are acronyms.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Unknown2:30 PM

    But why do you have to finish it at all? Think of the opportunity costs!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more