I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
I’m only visiting to say that I really enjoyed seeing this post, it is really clear and well written. Are you going to post more about this? air jordanIt appears like there is more material here for more posts
ReplyDeleteThat's the most flattering comment spam I've seen yet. Pointless and empty, but still flattering.
ReplyDeleteAndy, I'm just posting to say that I really enjoyed seeing your comment, it is really clear and well written. Are you going to post more about this?
ReplyDeleteOh, yes. Is it really okay that my second sentence has no verb? Can it still be a sentence?
ReplyDeleteAndy, I enjoy seeing your sentences without verbs because they are so clear and well written. Are you going to post more sentences without verbs?
ReplyDeleteAndy punked out, so I'll post a sentence with no verb. Shit! Or maybe that's a sentence with no noun. Oh, well.
ReplyDelete