OpenOffice Impress...

By -
is a total piece of rubbish. It hangs on my Mac about once a day, losing all my work since my last save. It lets you work on outlines, but doesn't seem to let you print them. The printouts of your slides are crap. The help is pathetic. And just today, I worked on a presentation for a while in outline mode, and when I went back to slide view it turned out that working in outline view had trashed all of my slides -- formatting was ruined, photos and graphics moved to different slides, and more.

I'm going to go buy a real piece of software.

Comments

  1. scineram8:13 PM

    http://www.mininova.org/tor/2662756

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous9:44 AM

    OpenOffice is written in Java. You could try NeoOffice, a port of OpenOffice to Objective C. But I really recommend Apple's own iWork. High quality, built new and rethought, but can still real old MS formats. Cheaper than Office.

    Rob

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah2:20 PM

    Thanks, Rob.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3:43 PM

    Actually NeoOffice may still be Java I've heard but anyway, try iWork.

    Rob

    ReplyDelete
  5. Unknown11:01 AM

    OpenOffice on the Mac has problems because it has to run the XServer window manager on top of OSX's native window manager. The problem is that the XServer that comes installed really is not good and is really buggy. Installing the newer XServer is no small task, either, but it does run better under that. An easier work-around may be to actually install VirtualBox on your Mac, load up an Ubuntu .iso file inside of it and run OpenOffice inside of Ubuntu inside of VirtualBox on your Mac. Sounds complicated, but it's the simplest solution that I've been able to come to regarding using OpenOffice on the Mac.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more