Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Banning Smoking in Restaurants

and slaughtering political dissidents amounts to about the same thing, according to David Kramer.

1 comment:

  1. Yes, David Kramer is susceptible to the fallacy of "affirming the consequent" -- just because the Nazis opposed smoking doesn't mean that everyone who opposes smoking is a Nazi. X implies Y is not the same as Y implies X.

    Here is another example of Kramer committing this fallacy: http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/58125.html (the part where Kramer claims someone claimed Rothbard was a Marxist).

    ReplyDelete

The individual of methodological individualism...

is a modern invention : Prince Modupe of the So-so tribe says that at the turn of the century in Africa, “Any destiny apart from the trib...