How Does Jeremy Lin Survive the Rigors of the NBA...

By -
when he "poisons" himself with grains every day?

"My diet consists of healthy carbs, proteins, veggies and fruits. For carbs I like to eat pasta, couscous, and rice. All the meats I eat have to be lean and healthy like fish, chicken, and steak."-- Jeremy Lin

Comments

  1. Anonymous8:00 PM

    In his sport it makes sense to eat more carbs than average due to the glycogen depletion, and pasta is pretty much a standard with athletes who use up a lot of glycogen (keep in mind that most athletic-geared diets have an emphasis on performance, not necessarily overall health). Lower carb diets are often helpful for endurance sports because it up-regulates the beta-oxidation pathways, and if you train towards that end then your lactate threshold will tend to be much higher (thus allowing you to preserve glycogen for when you really need it).

    When it comes to grains, not all people are sensitive to gluten (gluten is what most people are weary about when it comes to certain grains), though research shows that a good number of people are sensitive (or have Celiac disease), especially if you're of a certain ancestry. I didn't realize that I was gluten intolerant until I abstained from it for about a month or so and then reintroduced it, the symptoms were clear and pronounced (and kinda gross).

    In any case, everybody's physiology is a bit different due to genetics, there is no diet that is applicable to all persons, there are only rough guidelines. If you can handle things like gluten, then go ahead, if you can't, then abstain. But like I said, I had no idea that I was gluten intolerant until I experimented a bit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah2:11 PM

      Joseph, I understand why athletes do this. My point is that the more extreme paleo people will claim grains are "poisons." So how can pro athletes keep "poisoning" themselves and still succeed?

      Pointing this absurdity out is no criticism of more moderate paleos!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more