Danger Lurks in Park Slope

By -
My wife was a little worried about my daughter.

"She's got to walk eight blocks alone, in the dark! That's dangerous."

"Where is she?" I asked.

"Park Slope."

"That is dangerous: at any moment, she could be co-opted into an anti-fracking demonstration, or enlisted in an underground raw-milk co-op!"

Comments

  1. Samson Corwell1:47 PM

    I never really understood why cooperatives and voluntary organizations are attacked by conservatives or liberals and compared to dictatorships or what not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah1:58 PM

      "I never really understood why cooperatives and voluntary organizations are attacked by conservatives or liberals and compared to dictatorships or what not."

      Who was doing that?

      Delete
    2. Samson Corwell7:11 PM

      I've seen it around. Criticism of McDonald's workers striking for higher wages comes to mind. Over on a political forum that I belong to some users made retorts about the free market, poking fun at an OP's thread on the subject. I occasionally pick on uneasy anti-union rhetoric from free marketeers even though unions are part of the free market process.

      Delete
    3. gcallah7:52 PM

      Oh yes, Sampson, absolutely: you are correct, it is around. I just wondered if you thought that's what I was doing. But it is clear you did not.

      Delete
  2. Bob Murphy11:40 PM

    I naturally agree with anyone worried about a young lady walking by herself at night. But, Park Slope is better than Crown Heights.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more