Sometimes, the computer industry is pretty messed up

By -
I was just trying to install Office 2016 on my Mac laptop, and I received the message, "This software cannot be installed, because it is from an unknown developer."

So, Apple Computer has never heard of a developer called "Microsoft"?

Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!

Comments

  1. shonk10:35 AM

    OS X checks whether application bundles are signed by someone with a developer account, which is actually a decent way of preventing people from accidentally running malware pretending to be a legitimate program. Since Microsoft presumably has a developer account and knows how to sign its code, maybe the file either got corrupted somehow or came from some dubious source?

    If you're sure it's legitimate, you can run it anyway by right-clicking the app icon and choosing Open from the contextual menu.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah12:05 PM

      I understood basically what was up, and got it to install. And the file was straight from Microsoft, and did not appear to be corrupt.
      What really struck me was that Apple and Microsoft did not appear to be able to coordinate their efforts here!

      Delete
    2. Samson Corwell3:31 PM

      If it was improperly signed, signed with the wrong private key, not signed at all, or modified, then Gene wouldn't even be facing these troubles because the application simply wouldn't run.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more