This is not my beautiful code!

By -
This is from the movie Clear and Present Danger. The code appears very clearly on screen about an hour and 30 minutes into the movie. What struck me about it was that, at first glance, it almost appears as if they took the trouble to put some real code up there. But once I looked more closely, it appears to me to be nonsense. It is like someone who had seen a lot of code imitated what it looks like, in the same way that one of my sons can imitate Tagalog without being able to speak it. Can anyone recognize this as any actual programming language?



Comments

  1. Crosbie9:40 AM

    No answer here:

    http://movies.stackexchange.com/questions/30119/what-language-is-this

    "Surely gibberish. Some small segments have been taken from various programs in different languages and pasted together in a way that doesn't even make enough sense to be a joke."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah9:44 AM

      But what a curious thing to do! Why not just put in some real code, rather than sampling from various pieces of real code?

      Delete
    2. Samson Corwell3:22 PM

      It's not uncommon. If you zoom in on some newspaper articles or what not you might find "Lorem Ipsum" or just nonsensical sentences.

      Delete
    3. Andy10:33 PM

      This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Andy10:34 PM

      Could they be afraid of copyright issues grabbing random code off the web or a book, so they'd need to actually pay someone knowledgeable to write them a code snippet for the movie? Actually, they did just that. And he took the money and gave them this.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more