A top search string for this week

By -
For finding this blog was: "can u sexually harass Siri".

My memory fails me these days: is this something I discussed at one point?

Comments

  1. Andy8:46 AM

    Well, she is a dirty girl.

    http://gene-callahan.blogspot.com/2015/04/siri-loves-naughty-word.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous3:06 PM

    Hahaha, the funniest one I ever got was "poopie ecebomics"

    I think in the post, I had said the Obama administration had made a major poopie (like a big error), but I have no idea where the mispelling of 'economics' came from.

    -Bharat

    ReplyDelete
  3. Samson Corwell9:29 AM

    It's this one:
    Siri: Setting users up for sexual harassment charges since 2011    .

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more