My home page

By -
After years of not having one, I have once again created a personal web site.

Please have a look, and let me know what you think.

Comments

  1. Samson Corwell12:24 AM

    The theme for the website is a good one. All that's left, I guess, is to fill in content. But why make a website when you already have a blog?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah7:38 PM

      But... the content is there!

      And if you look at it, you may notice it is very different from a blog: it is permanent links to work more significant than blog posts.

      Delete
    2. Samson Corwell11:41 PM

      I caught on to that later. I already downloaded your PowerPoint presentations on Karl Marx, Adam Smith, and distributism.

      Delete
    3. Samson Corwell10:26 PM

      Linux is an example of distributism?

      Could you make a post on how you would go about implementing distributism? I think that would make an interesting subject.

      Delete
  2. Prateek8:35 AM

    I like it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah7:37 PM

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous2:29 PM

    Looks good!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more