Atomic "individuals"

By -
A culture of “atomic individualism” produces individuals addicted to atomic individualism!

The funny thing is that all of the “individuals” it produces have the exact same possessive attitude towards their "individuality" ("It's MY body and I can do whatever I want with it!" etc.), almost as if they were not really individuals at all, but mass-produced parts designed to fit into the machinery of state capitalism.

But don't think about that too much: just keep telling yourself, "But I really am a unique individual!" That is working fine for the hundreds of millions of others just like you!

Comments

  1. Prateek5:06 AM

    On a less politics/philosophy related note, I have noticed hipsters these days are all very similar.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Samson Corwell4:01 PM

      Heepsters!

      Delete
    2. Samson Corwell4:02 PM

      They have hipsters in India (if you are not in India, sorry for assuming you are Indian).

      Delete
    3. gcallah4:21 PM

      There are some Indians who live outside of India. At least one or two.

      Delete
    4. Prateek4:27 AM

      I live in Spain, but -

      There are hipsters in India, yes, which is the funny part.

      Having a long beard in India used to be a sign of being a traditional religious fundamentalists.

      Now, having a long beard is a sign of being a rebel against tradition!

      Delete
  2. Samson Corwell4:03 PM

    And this is suspicious?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah4:22 PM

      What is suspicious?

      Delete
    2. Samson Corwell1:00 PM

      All people in an individualist society being atomic individualists.

      Delete
    3. gcallah12:38 AM

      Not suspicious. It is a little... ironic?... that all of these "individuals" wind up acting the exact same way! Alexis de Tocqueville pointed this out about democracies: they don't really care much for real individuals. Aristocracies tend to produce those.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more