Trump's Running Mate Will Be...

By -


Oprah Winfrey. Or the closest he can get to Oprah.

Think about it: every personal fear voters have about Trump will be assuaged by having her (or someone like her) on the ticket:

Too volatile? He'll have Oprah there to calm and counsel him.

Racist? How could he be, if Oprah is running with him?

Anti-woman? See previous answer.

Remember, Trump has approached the whole campaign like a reality TV show. He's not going to ask, "Who would be most qualified if I die?" (not that conventional candidates do, but they pretend to) but "Who can I be paired with that will give me the biggest boost in ratings?"

Comments

  1. Greg Pandatshang11:25 AM

    You're talking sense here. However, there is one big problem: Oprah almost certainly doesn't want the job, and there is no one remotely like Oprah. Rikki Lake? Whoopi Goldberg? Oprah is regarded by her fans as on a whole 'nother level of auctoritas, not just an entertainer but a hero and role model. If she turns Trump down, maybe he'll try for Beyoncé next. Okay, ladies, let's get in formation!

    P.S. Always stay gracious; best revenge is your paper.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gcallah4:43 PM

      I bet he could convince her: first of all, they are almost certainly friends, have hung out at the same parties, etc. he will tell her ( quite truthfully ) that Hillary is the candidate of Wall Street and continue will warfare, and that the only chance to stop her is to unite and defeat the war party. I could see her buying it.

      What is the PS about? What paper are you referring to?

      Delete
    2. Greg Pandatshang10:42 PM

      I guess you're a little behind on memorising Beyoncé lyrics. She's just giving a miscellaneous encouragement here to live well. The only paper in question is cash money. I forgot I was responding to someone who has written actual academic papers.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more