I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose...
公募形式と違い
ReplyDelete外国為替証拠金取引ガイド
ネット証券
大阪府 墓石
クラミジア
館山 不動産
生理不順
銀行系 キャッシング
翻訳会社 大阪
女性の病気
キャッシング 比較
FXで勝つ!!
くりっく365
MT設置代行
マンスリーマンション
FX レバレッジ 比較
ゴールドカード
クレジットカード
CGI設置代行
落ち着いた雰囲気でインテリア性を高めるに…