Literally, Figuratively Speaking

By -
Of course it's an old and oft noted gaffe to use the word 'literally' as an intensifier, as in 'She yelled so loud she literally blew my head off', when, of course, the person doesn't mean that they actually lost their head.

Or so I thought until last night, when, laying awake in my unheated London flat, I suddenly realized the truth: the person in question is using the word 'literally' figuratively! And I mean literally figuratively, at least in the figurative sense of literally.

Doesn't that clear everything up for you?

Comments

  1. Bob Murphy2:33 PM

    It blew my mind.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous2:55 PM

    For all intensive purposes, that's true.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Danny4:52 PM

    I am literally paralyzed with shock. I can't even move my fingers to type this message.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous5:06 PM

    Nunnburg said:

    In the end, this is an eternal story of original sin and redemption. It's natural enough for
    us to use literally in a loose way to "affirm the truth of an exaggeration," as Bierce put it. If
    "I'm starving" is hyperbole, then "I'm literally starving" is simply more so. And when you
    think about it, the critics' objection to that use of literally is rather odd — it amounts to saying
    that literally is the only word in the language that can never be used in a figurative way. Even
    so, most of us come around once we become aware of the ridicule that we can come in for
    when we use literally loosely — "You don't mean you were literally floating on air?"

    ReplyDelete
  5. gcallah1:33 PM

    I am literally knocked out by your comments!

    ReplyDelete
  6. TGGP4:44 PM

    That is one of my major pet peeves.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous11:12 AM

    Now, how can we use "pedantic" figuratively?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous6:12 PM

    Bartkid sez,
    Now, that begs the question, is this the exception that proves the rule?

    ReplyDelete
  9. TGGP7:02 PM

    I think you mean "raises the question". To beg the question is logically fallacious.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Wabulon8:50 PM

    Somehow this reminds me of falsely claiming that "be" is a verb, when in fact it is the name of a verb, and therefore a noun. Oh, and the "literally" thing is a pet peeve of mine, too.

    ReplyDelete
  11. TokyoTom9:43 PM

    "old and oft noted"

    I`m old and often noted it, at least to myself, but I never heard anyone else do so, Gene. How far back have people been commenting on the metaphorical use of "literally"?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous8:17 AM

    Even worse: virtually.

    She was virtually helpless in face of the attack. ... Which begs the question - was she helpless or not?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Sylvan Payne9:56 PM

    She was virtually helpless in face of the attack. ... Which begs the question - was she helpless or not?

    See
    TGGP said...

    I think you mean "raises the question". To beg the question is logically fallacious.


    7:02 PM

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more