Live Near New York City?

By -
Then come see me present "Could Better Constitutional Design Have Saved the Roman Republic?" at the NYU Colloquium on Market Institutions & Economic Processes.

Comments

  1. TokyoTom11:27 PM

    Sorry, but NYC is a bit out of the way.

    How about tell us what your answer is?

    But of course constitutions are political compromises and not the product of a "design team" The (in)effectiveness of a constitution depends less on what it says than on the existence of political institutions/players willing to enforce it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous6:26 AM

    I'm there (possibly).

    ReplyDelete
  3. gcallah1:35 PM

    'But of course constitutions are political compromises and not the product of a "design team"'

    This is one of my (Oakeshott's) opints -- people think they are designing a constitution, but they are really just cobbling one together from bitsand pieces of traditions, customs, precepts, ideologies, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  4. gcallah1:38 PM

    How will I know it's you, Sidney?

    (Oh, and contact me as to how to get in the building if you're coming.)

    ReplyDelete
  5. gcallah12:20 PM

    Runescape money, I'm glad you're interested as well.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libertarians, My Libertarians!

By -
Cruel to be kind means that I love you . Because, while I think you are mistaken, your hearts are in the right place -- yes, even you, Silas --  unlike some people . This Breitbart fellow (discussed in the link above), by all appearances, deliberately doctored a video of Shirley Sherrod to make her remarks appear virulently racist, when they had, in fact, the opposite import. I heard that at a recent Austrian conference, some folks were talking about "Callahan's conservative turn." While that description is not entirely inaccurate, I must say that a lot of these people who today call themselves conservative give me the heebie-jeebies.
Read more

"Pre-Galilean" Foolishness

By -
 I am currently reading The Master and His Emissary , which appears to be an excellent book. ("Appears" because I don't know the neuroscience literature well enough to say for sure, yet.) But then on page 186 I find: "Asking cognition, however, to give a perspective on the relationship between cognition and affect is like asking astronomer in the pre-Galilean geocentric world, whether, in his opinion, the sun moves round the earth of the earth around the sun. To ask a question alone would be enough to label one as mad." OK, this is garbage. First of all, it should be pre-Copernican, not pre-Galilean. But much worse is that people have seriously been considering heliocentrism for many centuries before Copernicus. Aristarchus had proposed a heliocentric model in the 4th-century BC. It had generally been considered wrong, but not "mad." (And wrong for scientific reasons: Why, for instance, did we not observe stellar parallax?) And when Copernicus propose
Read more